We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.
  • INDUSTRY PRESS ROOM
  • SUBMISSIONS
  • MEDIA FILE
  • Create Account
  • Sign In
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Free Newsletters
  • MAGAZINE
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Digital Edition
    • Subscribe
    • Newsletters
  • STRATEGY
  • GLOBAL
  • LOGISTICS
  • MANUFACTURING
  • PROCUREMENT
  • VIDEO
    • News & Exclusives
    • Viewer Contributed
    • CSCMP EDGE 2022 Startup Alley
    • Upload your video
  • PODCAST ETC
    • Podcast
    • White Papers
    • Webcasts
    • Events
    • Blogs
      • Reflections
      • SCQ Forum
    • Mobile Apps
  • MAGAZINE
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Digital Edition
    • Subscribe
    • Newsletters
  • STRATEGY
  • GLOBAL
  • LOGISTICS
  • MANUFACTURING
  • PROCUREMENT
  • VIDEO
    • News & Exclusives
    • Viewer Contributed
    • CSCMP EDGE 2022 Startup Alley
    • Upload your video
  • PODCAST ETC
    • Podcast
    • White Papers
    • Webcasts
    • Events
    • Blogs
      • Reflections
      • SCQ Forum
    • Mobile Apps
Home » "Green" supply chains are still too costly
Perspective

"Green" supply chains are still too costly

February 26, 2014
James A. Cooke
No Comments

Although a lot of companies like to talk about their efforts to promote sustainability in the supply chain, only a few are serious about putting a significant amount of money into those efforts, especially when it comes to greenhouse gas reductions. That was a key finding in Collaborative Action on Climate Risk, a recent report from the consulting firm Accenture and CDP (formerly the Carbon Disclosure Project).

The Accenture/CDP report was based on a survey of 2,868 companies that, as a group, account for 14 percent of the world's industrial emissions. Researchers found that while more companies are reporting on their emission-reduction programs, investments in such programs have actually declined. In fact, the average sum of money invested per reporting company has dropped by 22 percent since last year. Researchers also found that when companies do invest in these programs, most want a payback in less than three years.

The Accenture/CDP findings jibe with the results of 2013 research by AlixPartners that also revealed reluctance among many companies to invest heavily in supply chain sustainability programs. "Given the fragile state of the world economy, it comes as no surprise that cost is the top inhibiting factor when it comes to implementing more far-reaching sustainable supply chain initiatives," AlixPartners' 2013 Executive Survey on Supply Chain Sustainability noted.

Like Accenture and CDP, AlixPartners found that most of the companies that were willing to spend on sustainable technologies were focusing on the short term. Respondents to the AlixPartners survey sought a payback within just 18 months or less, and only 17 percent said they were willing to accept a longer payback. Moreover, 65 percent of the executives surveyed said that the lack of a return on their investment was the biggest obstacle to achieving greater supply chain sustainability.

That brings up something that is a concern for many companies: When it comes to curbing greenhouse emissions, there often is no clearly visible, short-term payback. There are cases, of course, where the benefits to both the environment and the bottom line are easy to see. When companies consolidate shipments into fewer trucks, for example, the payback in terms of fuel and freight costs as well as reduced greenhouse gases can be measured immediately. And when they install energy-saving fixtures in their plants and warehouses, they'll quickly see lower electric bills—and they can be sure they're helping to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

But there's no obvious payback for investing in energy alternatives or technologies that would reduce carbon gases but do nothing to improve a company's cost picture. Moreover, there's certainly no reason to invest in technology that would only raise costs. And that's the hang-up. Without technologies that reduce carbon and have a financial payback, companies will remain hesitant to make their supply chains a vibrant "green."

    • Related Articles

      Are supply chain leaders born or made?

      Are you ready to supply the virtual store?

      Join the "Green Team"

    James A. Cooke is a supply chain software analyst. He was previously the editor of CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly and a staff writer for DC Velocity.

    Recent Articles by James A. Cooke

    Getting smart about using software intelligence

    The payback challenge

    A farewell, with thanks

    You must login or register in order to post a comment.

    Report Abusive Comment

    Most Popular Articles

    • Positive drug tests in U.S. workforce rise to 20-year high as marijuana is legalized

    • Wabash opens trailer manufacturing facility in Indiana

    • Six defining challenges of omnichannel fulfillment

    • Postal advocacy group says “excessive” July 9 stamp price hike will hurt consumers

    • CPKC and CSX buy rail assets from Genesee & Wyoming

    Featured Video

    8757b894 244c 4429 b5d8 e6df7b479d82

    Penalties for Wood Packaging Material Violations

    Viewer Contributed
    Our Services Include: Customs Broker Denver Freight Forwarder Denver Global Logistics Denver Cargo Insurance Denver Customs Bond Denver Customs Clearance Denver Customs Duty Denver Isf Filing Denver More details: Phone : 281-445-9779 Email: info@gallaghertransport.com Website: gallaghertransport.com

    FEATURED WHITE PAPERS

    • Five questions to ask before electrifying your indoor forklift fleet

    • Operator assist system myths busted

    • Three layers of forklift safety: Promoting operating best practices

    • The Complete Guide to Automated Packaging

    View More

    Subscribe to Supply Chain Quarterly

    Get Your Subscription
    • SUBSCRIBE
    • E-NEWSLETTERS
    • ADVERTISING
    • CUSTOMER CARE
    • CONTACT
    • ABOUT
    • STAFF
    • PRIVACY POLICY

    Copyright ©2023. All Rights ReservedDesign, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing