We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.
  • INDUSTRY PRESS ROOM
  • SUBMISSIONS
  • MEDIA FILE
  • Create Account
  • Sign In
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Free Newsletters
  • MAGAZINE
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Digital Edition
    • Subscribe
    • Newsletters
  • STRATEGY
  • GLOBAL
  • LOGISTICS
  • MANUFACTURING
  • PROCUREMENT
  • VIDEO
    • News & Exclusives
    • Viewer Contributed
    • CSCMP EDGE 2022 Startup Alley
    • Upload your video
  • PODCAST ETC
    • Podcast
    • White Papers
    • Webcasts
    • Events
    • Blogs
      • Reflections
      • SCQ Forum
    • Mobile Apps
  • MAGAZINE
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Digital Edition
    • Subscribe
    • Newsletters
  • STRATEGY
  • GLOBAL
  • LOGISTICS
  • MANUFACTURING
  • PROCUREMENT
  • VIDEO
    • News & Exclusives
    • Viewer Contributed
    • CSCMP EDGE 2022 Startup Alley
    • Upload your video
  • PODCAST ETC
    • Podcast
    • White Papers
    • Webcasts
    • Events
    • Blogs
      • Reflections
      • SCQ Forum
    • Mobile Apps
Home » Study: No link between supplier expenditures and risk
Forward Thinking

Study: No link between supplier expenditures and risk

January 23, 2014
Supply Chain Quarterly Staff
No Comments

A new study from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) contradicts the commonly held belief that the suppliers that pose the greatest degree of supply chain risk are those that receive the biggest annual payments from manufacturers. The study found no correlation between the total amount of money a manufacturer spends with a supplier and the financial loss from a supply disruption involving that supplier. Professors David Simchi-Levi of MIT, William Schmidt of Cornell University, and Yehua Wei of Duke University conducted the research.

The three academics studied Ford Motor Company's supply chain. Their quantitative analysis found that the suppliers whose disruption or failure would inflict the greatest blow to Ford's profits are those that provide the manufacturer with relatively low-cost components. "This explains why risk in a complex supply chain network often remains hidden," said Simchi-Levi in an article about the study in the MIT News newsletter. "The risk occurs in unexpected locations and components of a manufacturer's supply network."

Traditional methods of identifying the suppliers and events that pose the highest risk require knowing two things: the probability that a specific type of risk event will occur, and the magnitude of the problems that would ensue. Because a company's mitigation choices—maintaining more inventory or an alternative supply source—are the same regardless of the type of problem that occurs, Simchi-Levi reasoned, a more effective model of supply chain risk should calculate the impact of a supply disruption on a company's operation.

Simchi-Levi built a model that incorporated bill-of-material information and mapped each part or material to the appropriate Ford facilities and product lines. The model also considered multiple tiers of supplier relationships, supplier recovery time, and operational and financial impact.

As researchers removed individual nodes from the supply network, the model determined how to reallocate inventory, identify alternatives, and predict the associated financial impact. When applied to Ford's multitier supply network, the model predicted that a short-term disruption at 61 percent of the automaker's Tier 1 suppliers would not result in a profit loss. But a disruption among just 2 percent of Ford's suppliers would have a large impact on profits—even though each of those suppliers provides Ford with inexpensive components.

The researchers discuss their findings in "From Superstorms to Factory Fires: Managing Unpredictable Supply-Chain Disruptions," in the January/February issue of Harvard Business Review.

    • Related Articles

      Study finds link between mobile device management and worker productivity

      The link between driver turnover and motor carrier safety

      Millennials: No difference in trust, value between parcel delivery firms

    Recent Articles by Supply Chain Quarterly Staff

    More women join trucking industry as technicians

    GE Appliances unveils $450 million upgrade to manufacturing plant in KY

    Freight technology provider Loadsmart acquires computer vision platform provider

    You must login or register in order to post a comment.

    Report Abusive Comment

    Most Popular Articles

    • Wabash opens trailer manufacturing facility in Indiana

    • Six defining challenges of omnichannel fulfillment

    • Postal advocacy group says “excessive” July 9 stamp price hike will hurt consumers

    • California bill would require large corporations to disclose their greenhouse gas emissions

    • Panorays extends risk management throughout the digital supply chain

    Featured Video

    8757b894 244c 4429 b5d8 e6df7b479d82

    Penalties for Wood Packaging Material Violations

    Viewer Contributed
    Our Services Include: Customs Broker Denver Freight Forwarder Denver Global Logistics Denver Cargo Insurance Denver Customs Bond Denver Customs Clearance Denver Customs Duty Denver Isf Filing Denver More details: Phone : 281-445-9779 Email: info@gallaghertransport.com Website: gallaghertransport.com

    FEATURED WHITE PAPERS

    • Five questions to ask before electrifying your indoor forklift fleet

    • Operator assist system myths busted

    • Three layers of forklift safety: Promoting operating best practices

    • The Complete Guide to Automated Packaging

    View More

    Subscribe to Supply Chain Quarterly

    Get Your Subscription
    • SUBSCRIBE
    • E-NEWSLETTERS
    • ADVERTISING
    • CUSTOMER CARE
    • CONTACT
    • ABOUT
    • STAFF
    • PRIVACY POLICY

    Copyright ©2023. All Rights ReservedDesign, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing