We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.
  • ::COVID-19 COVERAGE::
  • INDUSTRY PRESS ROOM
  • SUBMISSIONS
  • MEDIA FILE
  • Create Account
  • Sign In
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Free Newsletters
  • MAGAZINE
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Digital Edition
    • Subscribe
    • Newsletters
  • STRATEGY
  • GLOBAL
  • LOGISTICS
  • MANUFACTURING
  • PROCUREMENT
  • VIDEO
    • News & Exclusives
    • Viewer Contributed
    • Upload your video
  • BLOGS & MORE
    • White Papers
    • Webcasts
    • Events
    • Blogs
      • SCQ Forum
      • Reflections
    • Mobile Apps
  • MAGAZINE
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Digital Edition
    • Subscribe
    • Newsletters
  • STRATEGY
  • GLOBAL
  • LOGISTICS
  • MANUFACTURING
  • PROCUREMENT
  • VIDEO
    • News & Exclusives
    • Viewer Contributed
    • Upload your video
  • BLOGS & MORE
    • White Papers
    • Webcasts
    • Events
    • Blogs
      • SCQ Forum
      • Reflections
    • Mobile Apps
Home » The changing geography of supply chains
Perspective

The changing geography of supply chains

November 28, 2012
James A. Cooke
No Comments

In the past year or so, a number of industry pundits have predicted that more manufacturing would leave Asia and come back to the United States. They point to rising wages in China, as well as to the high cost of transporting goods across long distances due to climbing oil prices, as the main factors driving this shift.

What kinds of products will migrate back to U.S. shores? A recent study conducted by the research firm TD Economics concluded that capital-intensive industries—such as computers and electronics, machinery, fabricated metals, electrical equipment, and plastics and rubber—are likely to lead the way. Labor-intensive industries like apparel probably will stay offshore.

But there are a couple of other factors behind the U.S. reshoring trend that have not gotten as much attention as labor and fuel costs. The first is the increasing use of robots. When manufacturers rely on robots rather than on human workers to do repetitive tasks, a plant's location becomes less important. It essentially costs as much to run a robot in Asia as it does in the United States. A robot, moreover, works 24 hours a day, seven days a week—without coffee breaks—and it doesn't require health insurance. It's worth noting that the giant contract electronics manufacturer Foxconn reportedly is starting to replace some workers with robots in its Chinese factories.

The emergence of additive, or rapid prototype, manufacturing is another factor that will promote reshoring. In additive manufacturing, a special printer follows a computer design, applying plastic or metal in layers to make a three-dimensional product. This technology makes it possible for manufacturers to produce high-value, one-of-a-kind items on demand to consumers' specifications, and therefore it is ideally suited for domestic production. Low-value, commodity-type products, such as clothing or garden hoses, will continue to be made offshore.

The return of some manufacturing to the United States will not spell an end to global supply chains. But supply chains in the future may not be as extensive and far-flung as they have been for the past few decades. That's because multinational companies are expected to increasingly embrace the regional theatre concept. One reason is that the rapid growth in consumer spending in developing economies is fueling demand for products. This will encourage manufacturers to maintain plants either in or adjacent to nations like China and India to serve that demand.

In the not-too-distant future, we could see the development of three major supply chain theaters: one for Europe, one for Asia, and one for the Americas. While more manufacturing undoubtedly will return to the United States—and other developed economies where offshoring has been the norm—supply chains will continue to forge global links for some time to come.

  • Related Articles

    Weaving 2 supply chains together

    LEGO's game-changing move

    Sharing supply chains for mutual gain

James A. Cooke is a supply chain software analyst. He was previously the editor of CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly and a staff writer for DC Velocity.

Recent Articles by James A. Cooke

Getting smart about using software intelligence

The payback challenge

A farewell, with thanks

You must login or register in order to post a comment.

Report Abusive Comment

Most Popular Articles

  • The 3PL industry: time to reset

  • Supply chain resiliency starts with supplier mapping

  • Freight market growth expected to slow in 2021

  • Seizing the helm

  • The Top Supply Chain Pains That You Should Address For a Healthier 2021

Featured Video

Be8de8b1 9bd3 48d6 9400 0bf476fd1f5d

Optimization Through Lean Management 

Viewer Contributed
Uncertain times can put a tremendous strain on your business’s people, processes and supply chains. However, operations can mitigate some of these factors by adopting lean management principles and instilling a culture of continuous improvement. Raymond Lean Management Manager of Solutions and Support Centers Keith...

FEATURED WHITE PAPERS

  • The Top Supply Chain Pains That You Should Address For a Healthier 2021

  • Research Report: New Rules for Supply Chain Insights, Collaboration and Overall Resiliency

  • Logistics 2030 – Navigating a Disruptive Decade (Year 2 Report)

View More

Subscribe to Supply Chain Quarterly

Get Your Subscription
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • E-NEWSLETTERS
  • ADVERTISING
  • CUSTOMER CARE
  • CONTACT
  • ABOUT
  • STAFF
  • PRIVACY POLICY

Copyright ©2021. All Rights ReservedDesign, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing