We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.
  • ::COVID-19 COVERAGE::
  • INDUSTRY PRESS ROOM
  • SUBMISSIONS
  • MEDIA FILE
  • Create Account
  • Sign In
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Free Newsletters
  • MAGAZINE
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Digital Edition
    • Subscribe
    • Newsletters
  • STRATEGY
  • GLOBAL
  • LOGISTICS
  • MANUFACTURING
  • PROCUREMENT
  • VIDEO
    • News & Exclusives
    • Viewer Contributed
    • Upload your video
  • PODCAST ETC
    • Podcast
    • White Papers
    • Webcasts
    • Events
    • Blogs
      • Reflections
      • SCQ Forum
    • Mobile Apps
  • MAGAZINE
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Digital Edition
    • Subscribe
    • Newsletters
  • STRATEGY
  • GLOBAL
  • LOGISTICS
  • MANUFACTURING
  • PROCUREMENT
  • VIDEO
    • News & Exclusives
    • Viewer Contributed
    • Upload your video
  • PODCAST ETC
    • Podcast
    • White Papers
    • Webcasts
    • Events
    • Blogs
      • Reflections
      • SCQ Forum
    • Mobile Apps
Home » Complexity requires more frequent network redesigns
Forward Thinking

Complexity requires more frequent network redesigns

December 21, 2011
Supply Chain Quarterly Staff
No Comments

The growing complexity of supply chains and the pace of change in business conditions are prompting companies to undertake more frequent network redesigns. That's a key finding in the Network Design Practices Report, a recent study conducted by the Tompkins Supply Chain Consortium. Sixty members of the consortium took part in the study.

In the two years since the group conducted similar research, the average length of time between network design studies has dropped from 24 months to 18 months. The average planning horizon for implementation is 4.6 years, down from the traditional 5?10 years. Redesigns now are more often spurred by an event such as a merger, rather than on the basis of time, as was generally the case in the past.

The study also found that only 10 percent of respondents considered their existing supply chain network to be "optimized." Another 50 percent said that their supply chain was "close to optimized." The remaining survey takers did not believe their network has been optimized, but not all believed change could be justified.

The report noted that companies are less satisfied with the software applications they use to conduct network studies than they were in the past. The previous study found that 31 percent of respondents were satisfied that their design tools met all of their requirements, but only 8 percent of respondents in this year's study felt that way. The report's authors speculated that the increasing complexity of supply chains and the difficulty of analyzing data and making decisions influenced participants' opinions.

Despite that dissatisfaction, 68 percent of respondents said they use some level of automation to perform network analysis. In addition, most of the software they deploy today provides some form of simulation capability.

Labor disruptions topped the list of risks participants consider when conducting a network analysis. That was followed by weak links in the supply chain, capacity shortages, and disruptions to product flow. The study also found that cost minimization remained the number one reason for companies to do a network analysis, followed by improving customer service and reducing capital outlays.

The entire report can be downloaded here.

  • Related Articles

    Study finds that companies are struggling to handle supply chain complexity

    How supply chain complexity affects buyer-supplier relationships

    Outsourcing complexity gives rise to "multisourcing"

Recent Articles by Supply Chain Quarterly Staff

Trucking market slumped under weight of diesel prices in March

Cargo volume stays strong in April

Consumers shrug off inflated prices to drive sales increase in April

You must login or register in order to post a comment.

Report Abusive Comment

Most Popular Articles

  • Is it time to blow up S&OP?

  • How to build a supplier diversity program that will drive long-term impact

  • Logistics pros warn of business impact from Russia-Ukraine war

  • Supply chain’s miracle workers

  • Container prices continue to drop

Featured Video

Cccb7d13 710a 4473 8132 da8b6cc286f1

The Sportsman's Guide Case study: Increasing Accuracy & Productivity

Viewer Contributed
Thanks to the Lucas Warehouse Optimization Suite, The Sportsman's Guide has increased productivity, reduced training time, and experienced a boost in accuracy for both full-time staff and seasonal employees. Want to learn how Lucas can help your DC be more efficient, accurate, and safe while reducing labor costs?...

FEATURED WHITE PAPERS

  • Omnitracs One – Last Mile Solutions

  • The enterprise shipper's guide to building a smarter truckload RFP

  • Fixed vs. Flexible Automation: Which Option is Better for 3PLs?

  • Enhancing Relationships in Logistics through Data & Collaboration

View More

Subscribe to Supply Chain Quarterly

Get Your Subscription
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • E-NEWSLETTERS
  • ADVERTISING
  • CUSTOMER CARE
  • CONTACT
  • ABOUT
  • STAFF
  • PRIVACY POLICY

Copyright ©2022. All Rights ReservedDesign, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing