We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.
  • ::COVID-19 COVERAGE::
  • INDUSTRY PRESS ROOM
  • SUBMISSIONS
  • MEDIA FILE
  • Create Account
  • Sign In
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Free Newsletters
  • MAGAZINE
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Digital Edition
    • Subscribe
    • Newsletters
  • STRATEGY
  • GLOBAL
  • LOGISTICS
  • MANUFACTURING
  • PROCUREMENT
  • VIDEO
    • News & Exclusives
    • Viewer Contributed
    • Upload your video
  • BLOGS & MORE
    • White Papers
    • Webcasts
    • Events
    • Blogs
      • SCQ Forum
      • Reflections
    • Mobile Apps
  • MAGAZINE
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Digital Edition
    • Subscribe
    • Newsletters
  • STRATEGY
  • GLOBAL
  • LOGISTICS
  • MANUFACTURING
  • PROCUREMENT
  • VIDEO
    • News & Exclusives
    • Viewer Contributed
    • Upload your video
  • BLOGS & MORE
    • White Papers
    • Webcasts
    • Events
    • Blogs
      • SCQ Forum
      • Reflections
    • Mobile Apps
Home » Can lean and innovation coexist?
Feature Summary

Can lean and innovation coexist?

June 23, 2010
Supply Chain Quarterly Staff
No Comments

Research and development depends on trial and error, which suggests that a key part of basic research is that enemy of lean thinking: waste. This raises an important question: Can lean thinking and radical innovation coexist?

The answer, writes Michigan State University Professor Steve Melnyk in the following excerpt from his classic Supply Chain Quarterly 2007 Quarter 3 article, is a qualified "yes."

But if these two approaches are to "live" together, a company must separate the system it relies on to foster innovation and new products from the system that it uses to drive out waste and variance and to standardize products and processes. Each system needs its own resources and its own controls. The innovation system can then become the "feeder" for the lean system. That is, once a new product has been found to be economically and strategically viable, it is then passed to the lean system for production. In this environment, "separate but equal" is a strategic and cultural imperative.

This does not mean that lean systems are flawed or somehow "wrong." Nothing could be further from the truth. Rather, this argument shows that there is no universal solution or system for every business situation.

Every system or solution will perform well in certain circumstances and poorly in others. Although a lean system is very effective for cost control, that achievement comes at a price: the cost of standardization. One of lean's guiding principles is that there is only one way to do things. Without standardization, there is no opportunity for improvement.

Yet standardization may reduce a company's flexibility. An emphasis on standardization can inhibit the ability to adopt new processes or to introduce radical breakthroughs, either in product or in process. The perceived need for sameness conflicts with the desire for differentiation.

The danger lies in allowing lean systems to stifle innovation by transforming radical breakthroughs (something that lean has difficulty handling) into incremental breakthroughs (something it can deal with). Companies that are competing in an environment that rewards innovation must ensure that their supply chains support and facilitate flexibility.

To read Melnyk's full article, see "Lean to a fault?" in the Quarter 3, 2007 issue of the Quarterly.

  • Related Articles

    Spreading the word about lean

    Look to lean in bad times

    Lean overtakes Six Sigma for corporate improvement

Recent Articles by Supply Chain Quarterly Staff

ProMatDX: Facility design in the age of “new” commerce

ProMatDX: Finding sustainable warehouse solutions

ProMatDX 2021: retailers turn to DOM and OMS software to meet shoppers’ high expectations

You must login or register in order to post a comment.

Report Abusive Comment

Most Popular Articles

  • COVID-19 and the health care supply chain: impacts and lessons learned

  • Domino effects of Suez Canal blockage could last for months

  • Do or Die for the Obsolete Supply Chain Management Practices in 2021

  • What type of supply chain strategy drives market cap leadership?

  • Demand for robotic goods-to-person systems to quadruple through 2023

Featured Video

6cabd6ef 64df 4460 bb11 e90c2bdea0a5

Identifying Intralogistics Solutions to Fit Your Operation: LinkedIn Live Ep. 4

Viewer Contributed
As technology evolves, the advantages of using semi- and fully automated solutions to increase productivity and address labor shortages are clear. However, before an organization jumps fully into automation, optimization is a key step that must happen first. Intralogistics solutions, such as Raymond’s iWAREHOUSE and...

FEATURED WHITE PAPERS

  • Special Report: Supply Chain Trends in Retail & Consumer Goods

  • Operations: Adapt Fast or Disappear

  • Using innovation to manage peak seasonal demand

  • Warehouse Management System Project Toolkit

View More

Subscribe to Supply Chain Quarterly

Get Your Subscription
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • E-NEWSLETTERS
  • ADVERTISING
  • CUSTOMER CARE
  • CONTACT
  • ABOUT
  • STAFF
  • PRIVACY POLICY

Copyright ©2021. All Rights ReservedDesign, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing