We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.
  • INDUSTRY PRESS ROOM
  • SUBMISSIONS
  • MEDIA FILE
  • Create Account
  • Sign In
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Free Newsletters
  • MAGAZINE
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Digital Edition
    • Subscribe
    • Newsletters
  • STRATEGY
  • GLOBAL
  • LOGISTICS
  • MANUFACTURING
  • PROCUREMENT
  • VIDEO
    • News & Exclusives
    • Viewer Contributed
    • CSCMP EDGE 2022 Startup Alley
    • Upload your video
  • PODCAST ETC
    • Podcast
    • White Papers
    • Webcasts
    • Events
    • Blogs
      • Reflections
      • SCQ Forum
    • Mobile Apps
  • MAGAZINE
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Digital Edition
    • Subscribe
    • Newsletters
  • STRATEGY
  • GLOBAL
  • LOGISTICS
  • MANUFACTURING
  • PROCUREMENT
  • VIDEO
    • News & Exclusives
    • Viewer Contributed
    • CSCMP EDGE 2022 Startup Alley
    • Upload your video
  • PODCAST ETC
    • Podcast
    • White Papers
    • Webcasts
    • Events
    • Blogs
      • Reflections
      • SCQ Forum
    • Mobile Apps
Home » A case for "supermodeling"
Feature Summary

A case for "supermodeling"

February 22, 2010
Supply Chain Quarterly Staff
No Comments

No one can predict the future. But by using "supermodeling," or a computer replica of a real or planned supply chain system, companies can get close, write Knud Erik Wichmann and Tim Lawrence in "Painting a bigger picture" from the Quarter 4/2009 issue of CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly.

Supermodeling helps companies plan ahead by defining potential scenarios, risks, and options, and then assessing the likely outcomes of each. Here's how the process worked for one example company.

The company wanted to move from a decentralized distribution network in Europe to a more centralized one. With 16 distribution centers (DCs) in the "as is" situation, this was not a simple optimization exercise. Complicating matters was the fact that all of the country directors were against closing "their" warehouses. It was important to help them objectively evaluate and compare alternatives. To accomplish this, the company's European logistics organization followed four steps.

Step 1. Develop a baseline. The company created a baseline scenario by using a computer model to simulate one year of operation as the network was currently structured. The baseline gave the company confidence in the model because it generated total annual logistics costs, inventory levels, and delivery performance that were approximately the same as in real life.

Step 2. Develop future scenarios.The team changed inputs to the model, producing several simulated scenarios and showing the associated effects on costs and service. This allowed the team to understand the problems in the network and draw up a short list of realistic potential solutions.

Step 3. Evaluate options. The model proposed closing down various groups of DCs and simulated the outcomes, testing for all kinds of "what ifs." The solution that proved best —cutting back from 16 DCs to three — would allow the company to cover all of its markets in Europe while enjoying a 20-percent saving in logistics costs.

4. Evaluate results. Members of the company's wider European logistics organization jointly selected the best solution. The modeling approach helped to establish consensus among the stakeholders, avoiding the dangerous route of making decisions based on political and emotional resistance to change.

Subscribers to CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly can read the full text of the article here. To subscribe to the Quarterly and gain full access to all current and archived articles, click here.

  • Related Articles

    The quiet case for RFID

    Fetch and Korber team up on automated case picking system

    Demand-driven planning both a focus and a challenge for large companies

Recent Articles by Supply Chain Quarterly Staff

Freight sector missed the boat on strong U.S. economy in Q3 and Q4, FTR says

Freightos completes plan to go public on NASDAQ exchange, raises $80 million

Retailers lose visibility as they outsource last-mile delivery, FarEye says

You must login or register in order to post a comment.

Report Abusive Comment

Most Popular Articles

  • Forecasts call for freight rate slumps in 2023

  • Projected U.S. recession in early 2023 will soften freight market

  • Inflation drops again as interest rate hikes hit home, NRF says

  • How to avoid the next crisis: A new approach to supply chain agility

  • Five levers to build a resilient supply chain

Featured Video

20221107korber large vs

Enhancing Customer Experience with Your Supply Chain Strategy

Viewer Contributed
With the rise of e-commerce, many businesses have had to transform their warehouses to handle online orders in addition to regularly scheduled inventory shipments. This means warehouses need more information than ever before to ensure they can meet customers' needs. As a result, companies need to select warehouse...

FEATURED WHITE PAPERS

  • Guide to Pallet Rack Safety

  • 3PLs: Complete Orders Faster with Flexible Automation

  • A shipper's guide to navigating post-pandemic holiday freight

  • THE NEW WAY TO WAREHOUSE: 4 Innovations in Automation & Robotics to Boost Warehouse Productivity

View More

Subscribe to Supply Chain Quarterly

Get Your Subscription
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • E-NEWSLETTERS
  • ADVERTISING
  • CUSTOMER CARE
  • CONTACT
  • ABOUT
  • STAFF
  • PRIVACY POLICY

Copyright ©2023. All Rights ReservedDesign, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing