We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.
  • ::COVID-19 COVERAGE::
  • INDUSTRY PRESS ROOM
  • SUBMISSIONS
  • MEDIA FILE
  • Create Account
  • Sign In
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Free Newsletters
  • MAGAZINE
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Digital Edition
    • Subscribe
    • Newsletters
  • STRATEGY
  • GLOBAL
  • LOGISTICS
  • MANUFACTURING
  • PROCUREMENT
  • VIDEO
    • News & Exclusives
    • Viewer Contributed
    • Upload your video
  • BLOGS & MORE
    • White Papers
    • Webcasts
    • Events
    • Blogs
      • SCQ Forum
      • Reflections
    • Mobile Apps
  • MAGAZINE
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Digital Edition
    • Subscribe
    • Newsletters
  • STRATEGY
  • GLOBAL
  • LOGISTICS
  • MANUFACTURING
  • PROCUREMENT
  • VIDEO
    • News & Exclusives
    • Viewer Contributed
    • Upload your video
  • BLOGS & MORE
    • White Papers
    • Webcasts
    • Events
    • Blogs
      • SCQ Forum
      • Reflections
    • Mobile Apps
Home » Supply chains and peace
Afterword

Supply chains and peace

July 1, 2009
Peter Bradley
No Comments

One of the ideas that Thomas Friedman promoted in his book The World Is Flat was that globalization could act as a force for peace. Nations that rely on one another for goods and services, he suggested, are less likely to engage in hostilities than those without such connections.

It is not a new idea. Baron de Montesquieu, the great 18th century French philosopher, once wrote, "The natural effect of commerce is to bring peace. Two nations that negotiate between themselves become reciprocally dependent, if one has an interest in buying and the other in selling. And all unions are based on mutual needs." (I owe this and other references to Montesquieu to a 2006 article in the Brooklyn Journal of International Law by Robert Howse, a professor at the University of Michigan Law School.)

Can trade really be a force for peace? It is a tempting proposition to embrace. Supply chain professionals in particular would like to think that their part in international business could in some small way contribute to peace and stability.

Montesquieu recognized that it is difficult to conduct commerce where hostility exists, even if hostilities have not reached the point of war. Yet, as Howse points out, there are times when warfare has enabled commerce, not during the havoc it unleashes, but often afterward by, for instance, opening trade routes. The hope is that over time the desire to trade for mutual benefit will overcome hostility.

Howse defines in some detail exactly what Montesquieu meant?—that he was referring to the sort of "economic commerce" that served the mutual needs of trading partners, rather than the "commerce of luxury" in which the powerful exploit the weak.

In that context, it does seem that trade can be a force for peace if pursued with an open mind and the willingness to understand a would-be trading partner's goals. Trade almost by definition requires some level of mutual understanding, if not respect. "Commerce represents the idea of human society based not upon rule or domination but [upon] mutual neediness," Howse writes.

If trade is to help humans satisfy those needs, then states, which control and regulate international commerce, must make good-will efforts to set rules and enable practices that permit commerce to flourish. As round after round of trade talks have demonstrated, that is enormously difficult to achieve. Protectionist instincts remain powerful.

Now, I don't want to appear naïve here. Pressure to move toward globalization is built on self-interest, just as is pressure to close borders. What's required is strong leadership that can direct those powerful, commercial self interests toward an international trading system that benefits all the participants and is a deterrent to conflict. The philosophy behind this idea is complex?—and the practical execution will be much more so.

  • Related Articles

    A trade pact that could reshape global supply chains

    A champion for supply chains: interview with Kevin Smith

    Oil and the changing nature of supply chains

Recent Articles by Peter Bradley

Revisiting the TPP

Building resilience into the supply chain: interview with Yossi Sheffi

A champion for supply chains: interview with Kevin Smith

You must login or register in order to post a comment.

Report Abusive Comment

Most Popular Articles

  • The 3PL industry: time to reset

  • Resiliency starts with supplier mapping

  • Freight market growth expected to slow in 2021

  • COVID-19 and the health care supply chain: impacts and lessons learned

  • Retailers designing stores to support inventory and logistics work, not just shopping

Featured Video

6cabd6ef 64df 4460 bb11 e90c2bdea0a5

Identifying Intralogistics Solutions to Fit Your Operation: LinkedIn Live Ep. 4

Viewer Contributed
As technology evolves, the advantages of using semi- and fully automated solutions to increase productivity and address labor shortages are clear. However, before an organization jumps fully into automation, optimization is a key step that must happen first. Intralogistics solutions, such as Raymond’s iWAREHOUSE and...

FEATURED WHITE PAPERS

  • Using innovation to manage peak seasonal demand

  • Warehouse Management System Project Toolkit

  • Solving Talent Management Challenges Now and In the Future

  • Shaping Up Last Mile Delivery to Surpass Customer Expectations

View More

Subscribe to Supply Chain Quarterly

Get Your Subscription
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • E-NEWSLETTERS
  • ADVERTISING
  • CUSTOMER CARE
  • CONTACT
  • ABOUT
  • STAFF
  • PRIVACY POLICY

Copyright ©2021. All Rights ReservedDesign, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing