We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.
  • INDUSTRY PRESS ROOM
  • SUBMISSIONS
  • MEDIA FILE
  • Create Account
  • Sign In
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Free Newsletters
  • MAGAZINE
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Digital Edition
    • Subscribe
    • Newsletters
  • STRATEGY
  • GLOBAL
  • LOGISTICS
  • MANUFACTURING
  • PROCUREMENT
  • VIDEO
    • News & Exclusives
    • Viewer Contributed
    • CSCMP EDGE 2022 Startup Alley
    • Upload your video
  • PODCAST ETC
    • Podcast
    • White Papers
    • Webcasts
    • Events
    • Blogs
      • Reflections
      • SCQ Forum
    • Mobile Apps
  • MAGAZINE
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Digital Edition
    • Subscribe
    • Newsletters
  • STRATEGY
  • GLOBAL
  • LOGISTICS
  • MANUFACTURING
  • PROCUREMENT
  • VIDEO
    • News & Exclusives
    • Viewer Contributed
    • CSCMP EDGE 2022 Startup Alley
    • Upload your video
  • PODCAST ETC
    • Podcast
    • White Papers
    • Webcasts
    • Events
    • Blogs
      • Reflections
      • SCQ Forum
    • Mobile Apps
Home » Forget customer service; controlling omnichannel costs is retailers' new top priority
Forward Thinking

Forget customer service; controlling omnichannel costs is retailers' new top priority

February 21, 2017
Supply Chain Quarterly Staff
No Comments

First the good news: U.S. holiday retail sales in 2016 were up more than 4 percent over sales during the same period in 2015. Now the bad news: That didn't seem to help retailers much. In December and January, several major chains announced or carried out layoffs and store closings, including Macy's, JC Penney, CVS, and The Limited (the last of which recently closed all of its mall stores). This comes on top of the 2016 demise of Sports Authority and store closing announcements by Sears, Kmart, Office Depot, and others. Even Wal-Mart is closing hundreds of stores.

The economic, technological, and societal forces that have converged to create this industrywide upheaval are many: online shopping, changing consumer preferences, the explosive growth in the number of e-commerce competitors, and the cost and operational challenges of omnichannel operations. Some of the responsibility for minimizing or counteracting the resulting damage falls on the shoulders of supply chain managers. That is likely why respondents to the Retail Industry Leaders Association's (RILA) seventh annual "State of the Retail Supply Chain" survey said controlling supply chain costs would be their top strategic priority in 2017.

For the latest survey, Brian Gibson, Rafay Ishfaq, and Cliff Defee of Auburn University's Harbert College of Business polled RILA's members, the readers of Supply Chain Quarterly's sister publication, DC Velocity, and retailers that collaborate with the university's Center for Supply Chain Innovation. To round out the picture, the research team conducted telephone interviews with retail supply chain executives. The survey's 60 or so respondents represent U.S. retailers of all sizes, with projected 2017 revenues ranging from below $1 billion to more than $10 billion.

According to preliminary results from the survey, 42 percent of respondents said controlling supply chain costs would be their main strategic priority for 2017, up from 28 percent last year. Supporting revenue growth was second, with 31 percent (up from 22 percent in 2016), while balancing cost and service was third, at 19 percent, the same as last year. In 2016, "enhance customer service" was the top strategic priority, cited by 30 percent of respondents as their primary concern. This year, by contrast, just 8 percent said that would be their primary focus in 2017.

In particular, the survey results highlighted the challenges companies face when it comes to controlling the costs associated with omnichannel fulfillment and delivery services. Currently, 50 percent of respondents partially recover those costs, and another 40 percent recover none of them. Ten percent do not even measure omnichannel cost recovery. Only 40 percent of respondents believe it's even possible to fully recover those costs—something no respondent has yet achieved.

Respondents were also asked to name the three most effective ways they could "monetize" or control retail supply chain costs. At the top of their weighted list was leveraging a single inventory pool across all channels, followed by encouraging customers to buy online and pick up orders in stores, having vendors directly fulfill orders, and charging delivery fees for all orders.

But there are significant barriers to getting omnichannel costs under control. The top vote getters were an inability to measure and allocate costs, the variety of fulfillment options offered to customers, or competitors' willingness to absorb supply chain costs as either moderate or major barriers to controlling costs.

Nevertheless, Gibson sees some reasons for optimism. Retailers are gaining confidence in using analytics, which will help them improve forecast accuracy and retain current customers and sales. Additionally, most understand the value of cross-channel integration, he says. According to the survey, just over one-third of respondents said they are pursuing integration of online and store fulfillment activities, while 16 percent said they had already achieved that goal. "The level of omnichannel integration compared to where we were when we first started the survey has vastly improved," he says.

But most supply chain organizations will struggle with omnichannel's biggest question: "How do we offset rising costs and make sure that as we take on additional supply chain costs, we're also driving revenue and profits? If you can answer that, you'll be in good shape," Gibson says. "If you can't answer that question, then you're going to be the next Limited or Sports Authority."

Editor's note: A longer article about the research results was published by our sister publication, DC Velocity. The study's final report will be available in mid-March at www.rila.org.

  • Related Articles

    Retailers turn to technology, policy changes to help contain omnichannel fulfillment costs

    Report: Managing disruption is top priority for sourcing, procurement execs

    Study: Reverse logistics still a puzzle for omnichannel retailers

Recent Articles by Supply Chain Quarterly Staff

Companies to grow investments in energy-transition solutions, emissions reduction

Cargo imports forecast to sink near three-year low in February

Air cargo demand slumped in 2022 after “extraordinary” levels in 2021

You must login or register in order to post a comment.

Report Abusive Comment

Most Popular Articles

  • Forecasts call for freight rate slumps in 2023

  • Projected U.S. recession in early 2023 will soften freight market

  • Inflation drops again as interest rate hikes hit home, NRF says

  • How to avoid the next crisis: A new approach to supply chain agility

  • New Jersey truck fleet says Freightliner tractors will deliver safety as well as freight

Featured Video

20221107korber large vs

Enhancing Customer Experience with Your Supply Chain Strategy

Viewer Contributed
With the rise of e-commerce, many businesses have had to transform their warehouses to handle online orders in addition to regularly scheduled inventory shipments. This means warehouses need more information than ever before to ensure they can meet customers' needs. As a result, companies need to select warehouse...

FEATURED WHITE PAPERS

  • Guide to Pallet Rack Safety

  • 3PLs: Complete Orders Faster with Flexible Automation

  • A shipper's guide to navigating post-pandemic holiday freight

  • THE NEW WAY TO WAREHOUSE: 4 Innovations in Automation & Robotics to Boost Warehouse Productivity

View More

Subscribe to Supply Chain Quarterly

Get Your Subscription
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • E-NEWSLETTERS
  • ADVERTISING
  • CUSTOMER CARE
  • CONTACT
  • ABOUT
  • STAFF
  • PRIVACY POLICY

Copyright ©2023. All Rights ReservedDesign, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing