We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.
  • ::COVID-19 COVERAGE::
  • INDUSTRY PRESS ROOM
  • SUBMISSIONS
  • MEDIA FILE
  • Create Account
  • Sign In
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Free Newsletters
  • MAGAZINE
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Digital Edition
    • Subscribe
    • Newsletters
  • STRATEGY
  • GLOBAL
  • LOGISTICS
  • MANUFACTURING
  • PROCUREMENT
  • VIDEO
    • News & Exclusives
    • Viewer Contributed
    • Upload your video
  • BLOGS & MORE
    • White Papers
    • Webcasts
    • Events
    • Blogs
      • SCQ Forum
      • Reflections
    • Mobile Apps
  • MAGAZINE
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Digital Edition
    • Subscribe
    • Newsletters
  • STRATEGY
  • GLOBAL
  • LOGISTICS
  • MANUFACTURING
  • PROCUREMENT
  • VIDEO
    • News & Exclusives
    • Viewer Contributed
    • Upload your video
  • BLOGS & MORE
    • White Papers
    • Webcasts
    • Events
    • Blogs
      • SCQ Forum
      • Reflections
    • Mobile Apps
Home » Tech companies should do more to eliminate slavery, forced labor in their supply chains, report says
Forward Thinking

Tech companies should do more to eliminate slavery, forced labor in their supply chains, report says

July 8, 2016
Supply Chain Quarterly Staff
No Comments

A recent report asserts that while companies in the information and communications technology (ICT) industry are aware of the risk that forced labor is being used in their supply chains, they are not doing enough to address the issue.

"The ICT Benchmark Finding Report" from KnowTheChain, an organization that educates companies about labor abuses within their supply chains, evaluated 20 of the largest ICT companies on their efforts to eradicate forced labor from their global supply chains. The assessment was based on information from the companies' websites as well as additional public disclosures they provided in response to KnowTheChain's inquiries.

The ICT industry is one of the most at-risk sectors for forced labor, according to KnowTheChain. The group cites a 2014 study by Verité, a nongovernmental organization focused on social responsibility in the supply chain, which found that one in three foreign workers in the electronics industry in Malaysia could be classified as forced labor. Many major ICT brands source components in that country.

For its own study, KnowTheChain evaluated companies in seven areas: commitment and governance; traceability and risk assessment; purchasing practices; recruitment; "worker voice"; monitoring; and remedy. According to the report, 18 of the 20 companies have made a public commitment to address forced labor, but far fewer have policies and practices in place for actually doing so. Of particular concern are migrant workers employed in factories, who often find themselves in debt to recruitment agents, deprived of access to their passports, and working excessive hours for minimal pay.

One of the largest areas of concern, the report says, is in the area of "worker voice." KnowTheChain says that most companies are disclosing too little information on how the workers employed by their first and second-tier suppliers can express grievances and whether they are able to associate freely.

Another area where supply chain workers are vulnerable to exploitation is recruitment. In particular, many recruitment agencies charge workers high fees to secure a job. Only a few companies have implemented policies to combat this practice. Examples include HP, which requires its suppliers to directly employ their workers and minimize the use of recruitment agencies, and Apple and Cisco, which require their suppliers to reimburse workers for any recruitment fees and to disclose the total amount of fees they have reimbursed. In general, however, researchers found a low level of awareness of the risk of forced labor associated with recruitment agencies among the companies it studied.

Scores for the 20 benchmarked companies differed widely. HP and Apple scored the highest, with 72 and 62 out of a possible 100, respectively. More than half of the companies scored under 50 points, however, and three (BOE Technology, Canon, and Keyence) scored under 15 points.

The published report contains not only the benchmark information but also recommended actions companies could take. KnowTheChain will be releasing similar benchmark reports for the food and beverage and apparel and footwear sectors later in the year.

  • Related Articles

    Five corporations pledge to change their supplier codes of conduct to fight forced labor in their supply chains

    Companies need to do more to incorporate financial controls into their planning process

    Tech companies join forces to help retailers modernize their supply chains

Recent Articles by Supply Chain Quarterly Staff

Industrial businesses gearing up for post-pandemic rebound, sourcing stats show

Shortage of ocean containers shows no sign of easing

Soaring import volumes squeeze warehouse markets near seaports

You must login or register in order to post a comment.

Report Abusive Comment

Most Popular Articles

  • COVID-19 and the health care supply chain: impacts and lessons learned

  • Shortage of ocean containers shows no sign of easing

  • Domino effects of Suez Canal blockage could last for months

  • What type of supply chain strategy drives market cap leadership?

  • Demand for robotic goods-to-person systems to quadruple through 2023

Featured Video

910a16cb f2e9 4d82 aec8 2e038d7c218c

Making the Switch to Reusable Pallets in Your Supply Chain

Viewer Contributed
Reusable plastic pallets offer food, beverage and CPG companies a hygienic, sustainable and reliable way to store and move product within their plants and beyond. In recent testing, plastic pallets can travel up to 200 trips versus alternative wood pallets that travel 11 trips. Attend to learn more about making the...

FEATURED WHITE PAPERS

  • Special Report: Supply Chain Trends in Retail & Consumer Goods

  • Operations: Adapt Fast or Disappear

  • Using innovation to manage peak seasonal demand

  • Warehouse Management System Project Toolkit

View More

Subscribe to Supply Chain Quarterly

Get Your Subscription
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • E-NEWSLETTERS
  • ADVERTISING
  • CUSTOMER CARE
  • CONTACT
  • ABOUT
  • STAFF
  • PRIVACY POLICY

Copyright ©2021. All Rights ReservedDesign, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing