CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly
October 22, 2018

Time to reconsider VMI?

A successful VMI program depends on accurate forecasts of consumer demand, which have proved elusive.

I first wrote about the concept of vendor-managed inventory (VMI) back in the 1980s. That original article described how a major U.S.-based snack-food company maintained its own inventory at each store operated by a well-known grocery chain. The snack-food manufacturer took responsibility for monitoring stock levels on the assumption that it was in its own interest to keep adequate stocks on the grocer's shelves and thereby minimize lost sales. Each day, therefore, a deliveryman would show up at the stores to restock the shelves and arrange the displayed items to catch the consumer's eye.

Since then, the practice of vendor-managed inventory has spread throughout the retail and grocery industries, and even into other sectors like the gasoline retail business. Moreover, most big-box retailers employ this practice with many of their key suppliers today.

But many consumer packaged goods (CPG) manufacturers now are starting to rethink the value of vendor-managed inventory. "I've been to probably 50 CPG companies in the last couple of years, and I cannot think of one that is interested in increasing its VMI base," Robert F. Byrne, chief executive officer of the software vendor Terra Technology, told me recently.

In fact, Byrne said, he knows of many companies that are cutting back on their use of VMI, and even of one multinational CPG company that's planning to stop rely on point-of-sale data to get a the practice altogether next year. Why the change? "The basic feeling is that VMI is too expensive [in comparison to] the benefits," he said.

A successful VMI program depends on accurate forecasts of consumer demand, which have proved elusive. Instead of vendor-managed inventory, most CPG manufacturers would rather clearer picture of what inventory should be on hand to meet demand. The demand signal or point-of-sale information gleaned from the cash register would drive replenishment as well as store-level inventory holdings. The adoption of this approach would allow for automatic replenishment of store merchandise— "something that never worked in VMI," Byrne said.

Vendor-managed inventory places the burden squarely on the manufacturer. As more manufacturers work to tighten up production and reduce their inventory holdings in these trying economic times, they will be looking for more help from their retailer customers... or at least more access to their data. It will be interesting to see to what extent retailers will be willing to share that data with their suppliers.

James A. Cooke is a supply chain software analyst. He was previously the editor of CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly and a staff writer for DC Velocity.

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you're not already logged in, you will be asked to log in or register.

Want more articles like this? Sign up for a free subscription to Supply Chain Executive Insight, a monthly e-newsletter that provides insights and commentary on supply chain trends and developments. Click here to subscribe.

We Want to Hear From You! We invite you to share your thoughts and opinions about this article by sending an e-mail to ?Subject=Letter to the Editor: Quarter 2011: Time to reconsider VMI?"> . We will publish selected readers' comments in future issues of CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly. Correspondence may be edited for clarity or for length.

Want more articles like this? Subscribe to CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly.